Mari Smith  
 
Search
SUBSCRIBE TO THE RSS FEED
SUBSCRIBE VIA E-MAIL
May 5th, 2009
Retweet Hijacking – What Would You Do?

[UPDATE 5.6.09 8:32PM PDT: I just got off the phone with the President of the company that the retweet hijack webmaster worked for. The conversation went well and I appreciate now that the company is a global organization with a large staff and an excellent reputation. The situation unfortunately got out of hand. I have chosen to edit this post to remove the company name.]

[IMPORTANT UPDATE 5.5.09 2:45PM PDT: Josh xxxx (last name removed), webmaster for @(name removed) has been in touch with me via email and also commented on my post (see below) and this post and on Twitter to extend his apologies and express his regret for the actions he took. I appreciate the gesture and may consider taking this post down, per Josh's request... or at least making it anonymous, such that further repercussions are avoided.]

I don’t know about you, but I give GREAT care as to what I tweet about, even in my @ replies and conversations… even DM’s (direct messages). I run everything through an internal filter of:

  1. Would I be okay with this on the front page of the NYT?
  2. Would I be okay for this to be found in a Google search? and/or
  3. Would I be proud for my grandchildren to see this in 20 years’ time? (Exaggeration maybe, but content does hang around the internet for a long time!)

And, I’m always upbeat, positive and focused on adding value. (My tweeting style has been described as the “little Tony Robbins on your shoulder!”)

Now, I appreciate there are no “hard and fast” rules to using Twitter – or any social network, for that matter. BUT there are most certainly general rules of etiquette. And there’s personal INTEGRITY. Something very dear to my heart.

This morning, I put out this tweet: “Mother’s Day is coming up on May 10! This is a great site & service for same day gifts! http://flowersfast.com.”

image

One of the reasons I chose this site to tweet is I know the owner of the site and service personally.

I was delighted to see several retweets. But then something odd caught my eye – a guy retweeted me, but replaced the link I tweeted with a link to his OWN website, thereby inferring I was endorsing his site. UGH! That is the antithesis to best practice. I was not amused. See the screenshot below: @(name removed)’s tweet goes to his own xxxx site. :(

hijack_edit

If you know me at all, you know I’m not the type of person to put energy into anything negative; if there’s a challenge to deal with, I’d rather do so quietly and privately. So, I saw that @(name removed) and I were following each other thus allowing direct messaging.

I was a little, um, terse – I broke one of my own relationship rules and that is I sent a message while just a smidge emotional. It’s always best to allow a wee bit of time to calm down and gain perspective.

I also decided to send a regular tweet sharing what just happened… without outing Mr. xxxx just yet – to see if he could somehow rescue this situation. He didn’t. It seemed to get worse. I received a barrage of DM’s from Mr. xxxx telling me it’s a free country and it was “lame” to “legislate integrity.” Oh dear. Well, guess whose xxxx company I won’t be using. Yes, it’s a free country.

Ignoring this occurrence may have been a better choice. But I wanted to make an example of this practice – which I now understand is becoming more prevalent on Twitter. In fact, it’s called “Retweet Hijacking!”

image

Blocking someone on Twitter will not prevent this type of hijacking behavior.

What are your thoughts – what would you do? Have you experienced/seen any retweet hijacking? Do you agree with this xxxx guy that it’s a “free country” and he didn’t break any of Twitter’s Terms of Service? Should the citizens of the Twitterverse bandy together to ensure best practices? Please share in the comments below [click Comments]:

Related posts: Are You A Twitter ReTweet Thief ?

[UPDATE 5/5/09 8:54pm: New related post found: Twitter “RTs” leave room for misquotes, fabrications]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • co.mments
  • Fleck
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Drd1201
    Mari what bothers me most about this is, sometimes it happens and it's not intentional. The problem as I see it is with what's happening with the people who are doing this for another set of motives. I know the other day a guy really got all bent out of shape about this, which I can understand, some, but I really feel like he was talking about people who were jumping his brand and then completing the tweet with their web page? Glad you brought it out, great subject to discuss...
  • Mr. @jagoff™ should be given a strike against his account. Twitter should have a 3 strikes-and-you're-out policy regarding this behavior. Essentially, he has committed a type of slander, because if the business he has attributed with your endorsement is bad, it's a bad reflection on you. Therefore, you should have the right to defend your reputation. I think you have a legal case against him - you might express this to Twitter, rather than waste your time with this thieving *explicative*.
  • Drd1201
    Not when it's inadvertant - sometimes when someone RT's without meaning to they will slice and dice...when it's blatant, that's different...
  • Sorry to hear this Mari. Brings up an interesting topic around social responsibility. What and how integrity will be enforced in social media is well of course "social" combined w/the rules of the powers that be on the different platforms.

    What is most disappointing of this situation is that he could have apologized immed. via DM or public and tried to minimize the situation growing further out of control. That's where integrity comes in.

    Highlights the need for social media policies. This can happen even at the smallest companies. People are people and will make mistakes. A policy must include how to deal with controversy, issues that arise etc.

    What a not so great use of your day, heh!

    Just because someone can Tweet and post on Facebook, it doesn't make them qualified to be behind the driver seat of your brand in an open public forum of millions. Good lessons for business of all sizes of the importance of planning, education and policy.

    My 3 cents ;)
  • L
    Maybe I'm a much more private person, but I would never have taken something like this and blown it out of proportion as it has been here. It seems to me that this being such a prevelant pracitice on twitter, it would be better to deal with the situation calmly and in a private setting. I think that [removed] is getting a bad wrap. Yes, our actions do have reprocussions, but this is getting a bit ridiculous. Behind computer screens sit human beings, and believe it or not people make mistakes. He apologized publicly and that's much more than you can say for most people. Putting a person's real name in the blog is tacky and a bit vindictive for someone who enjoys preaching about ethics.
  • Dave
    I'm sure this guy learned his lesson, but do you really think it is equitable to post an entire blog about it to try to ruin his life. This is really immature on Mari's part, and I feel sorry for this guy. I can't believe you posted his name! As long as he hasn't done it before and doesn't do it again, I think you should leave him alone.
  • Thanks so much for bringing this to light. I never knew this type of hijacking was going on and to think that a company wound do such a thing really would make me think twice about using that company.

    Please do keep us updated

    <abbr>Mike Cheungs last blog post..Oh Sunny Day</abbr>
  • I am deeply heartened by the strength and support of my community. Thank you all so much for taking the time to read this post and comments and add your valuable insights and input.

    This is most definitely a rather unfortunate situation. However, I do believe something good will come of this. I'm glad we stood together and declared our intolerance of unethical marketing behavior in *our* socialmediasphere/Twitterverse. We cannot let those with low standards spoil it for others.

    I am heartened to share that the Assistant VP and President of [removed] have contacted me privately as they were alerted to this situation by a loyal client. Awesome! I will be having a phone conversation with the President and we will be coming to a resolve. I look forward to sharing the outcome with you!

    Meantime, I think some of the lessons we can take away are, today now more than ever, companies need to a) be vigilant about who they choose to be the voice of their company b) be fiercely watchful over their reputation and c) take prompt action to rectify sticky situations.

    ...more shortly.
  • Mari,I hate that this would happen to you but I am not surprised. People want to ride on the coattails of others who are more successful. He knows you have a big (loyal and trusting) following and therefore took the opportunity to leverage it. Shame on him!

    As far as TOS, I think they would have to be carefully written to cover this. I personally know that I have changed a tweet when I retweeted it. Usually it is to shorten it when it runs over by adding the whole "RT..@..." piece. Sometimes, I tag a little comment on it, but (I think) it's obvious that it came from me and not the original Tweeter.

    Josh, welcome to the age of social media. It isn't a one-way street anymore. And that is the beauty of it, at its heart. Conversations are allowed, indeed encouraged. Relationships are built, and yes, that means we stick together, banding against the playground bullies.

    Chin up Mari! Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery :-) Happy Hump Day!
  • Mari: The 'you' with regard to wow, shocked, amazing, was not aimed at you; if it read like that then sorry! Was referring to comments.
  • The guy's a creep. You've outed him. Forget it. As for "Wow", "shocked" or "amazing" - are you serious? What planet are you living on? This one is full of humans. Even on Twitter. And that's how a lot of them behave!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Wow... didn't realize that people were substituting links! I've been getting steamed at seeing people send out tweets that are really RTs, but not acknowledging the original source... Maybe *this* should be called "RT link-jacking!"
  • I'm not clear on why you're so upset Josh. The people here are just stating their opinions of your actions, and as you said in one of your tweets yesterday, "Its a wide open world, and people can use it how they want."

    They haven't done anything against Mari's "terms of svc" and they "didn't do anything wrong".

    As "the web guy" for the limo company, I'm assuming it was your responsibility to create a brand for the company on Twitter. Well, you certainly branded it with your actions yesterday. Unfortunately, it is your employer who will most likely suffer the consequences because of them.

    But that is the nature of the beast known as the internet,
    particularly, "social media", and you've found out too late that once a can of worms has been opened, it is almost impossible to put them back in.

    What I find appalling, is that after your braggard statements to Mari and others that, it's a free country and it's "lame" to "legislate integrity", that you would have the audacity to accuse Mari of being "absolutely ingenuine" because she's allowing people to express their opinions on
    the example of your integrity that you set yesterday.

    What you're witnessing is "social networking" in action Josh, a coming together of a community to show support for one of its members.

    A community that you probably could have created yourself,
    had you not acted so nonchalantly about your "moment of bad judgment".

    It is your own statements made after the fact that are coming back to kick you in the butt Josh, which makes your indignation "sound a little preachy for me".

    My hope is that this experience serves as a wake-up call to all the other 'web guys' out there looking for a "bump on Google" to...

    "Watch your thoughts, they become your words
    Watch your words, they become your actions
    Watch your actions, they become your habits
    Watch your habits, they become your character
    Watch your character, it becomes your destiny."
  • Thank you for bringing this behavior to light.

    I believe the key to successful business is to build relationships over time by understanding each others wants and needs and then acting with integrity and honesty to accomplish goals in a timely fashion.

    <abbr>Clay Franklins last blog post..Microsoft Windows 7 RC free download for everyone</abbr>
  • Hi Mari... I'm kind of surprised no one has recommended this, and maybe you already do it, but I use TweetLater, which will send you alerts when your name is picked up on the network in open tweets. This is a great little service that will keep you on top of the action online as it pertains to your Twitter username. Great site BTW. I just found you via a conversation between @DarimK and @mayhemstudios discussing the hijack issue. I'll be following for sure. Cheers! @RichardBravo
  • Josh, (as I stated in response to the same post on my blog) you should consult with an attorney before YOU sir make wrongful claims yourself. It's clear you do not understand the definition of slander ... I have spoken with an attorney regarding this before ...

    "defamation ( slander ) is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image"

    No one has made "FALSE" statements implied as factual except for you, and yes your actions with the hijacked tweet could very well fall under that definition.

    Sure you admitted and apologized but in the apology you were still pointing the blame at Mari implying that she's the one who was at fault for being offended. There's a HUGE difference in telling someone "I'm sorry you were offended" and "I'm sorry for offending you" With your statements it's clear you are only sorry this has reached as many people as it has.

    It's only natural now that you see the consequences of your actions but if you indeed sent out a genuine apology I'm sure you could have saved face and possibly the reputation of your company.

    You claim to be just the web guy, and to be frank, if you were a web guy representing MY company you would have been fired on the spot and I as the owner would have come on to apologize.

    Instead you still attack the people who are only trying to stick up for what's right and ethical in business to make people like you think twice before they do something that can have such a damaging affect on their business.

    I'm sorry sir but YOU brought this on, and your actions are only fueling the flames.

    <abbr>Scott Procks last blog post..Retweet Hijacking - @MariSmith vs @[removed]</abbr>
  • Yuck. I had to wash my hands and unfollow after reading this. I follow almost anyone in the travel business and sure enough there was Mr. L. This is an open warning lesson for people to make sure you know who is representing your brand on Twitter, and that they know how you want it represented. Just a web guy is no excuse in my book. If your company has "just a web guy" tweeting in your name take note. He might have saved his skin with a quick and sincere apology. Mari you were 100% right on with your response.
  • Josh
    It is absolutely appaling to me that this has gone so far. What I did on Twitter is not as immoral as slamming one person and a whole business in the very public way that you have. THIS is slander. THIS is a deliberate shot at ruining someone's reputation, not what I did. What I did has no long term legal or financial ramifications. THIS does. You people should be ashamed of yourselves. To call me a "sleazy", "sneaky" and "un-ethical" person, and then allow this to continue and grow to the level that it has is UNETHICAL. That is why I did this in the first place. Mari's claim that ethics is so dear to her heart is absolutely ingenuine, when she allows this kind of stuff to happen. Sure, bring the issue to light, but this is bordering on slander. You should all take a long look in the mirror.
  • Sorry to see that this happened to you. Sadly jerks are in every walk of life and seem to enjoy runing it for the rest of us. I feel that what he did could easily be construed as fraud since he used your identity to promote something without your permission.

    One thing we can do is to never give this guy our business. It is the same with a restaraunt with rude servers, or any other business. You won't win customers with rudeness or fraud.
  • Diego Espinoza
    Yes, it is a free country, but what he's doing is changing your tweet entirely. He can't say that just because it is posted on the internet, he can do whatever he wants with it. What do you think he'd say if you take some images from his website and post them on another website? Of course he would be upset.
    I think he's a total jerk for doing that, honestly. If hijacking tweets is your way to promote your own business, you got it all wrong.
    I totally support you here, Mari.
  • Eve
    Wow, he was definitely in the wrong. I haven't noticed any of this happening, I guess I am too naive! I will be more aware when I click a link from now on!

    <abbr>Eves last blog post..Florida Lawmakers Eliminate State Funding for Public Libraries</abbr>
  • Hi Mari:

    I missed all of this yesterday as I was traveling and it was only a message that you sent me that caused me to delve into the situation further. I see Josh has apologized for this epic fail on his part. The most unfortunate part is that the owner of the company appears to be in no way responsible and yet it is his business that will suffer.

    Josh clearly did/does not understand that not everyone is on twitter simply to tell people what they had for lunch. It is, as you said, a strategic place for those of us who are trying to brand our business and at the same time add value and content to others.

    As you and I have talked personally on different occasions about our beliefs and values, I applaud you for taking a stand on this. It is difficult for those of us who are positive and optimistic people to allow any negativity in our lives to effect us. BUT as you pointed out relationships are integral to your business and allowing that compromise on your integrity is unacceptable.

    Take care dear lass:-) you did the right thing!
    Danielle
  • Josh
    HELLO - I'm @[removed], and I DID take responsibility for it. See my apology above. Talk about blind rhetoric...
  • "[removed]" lacks integrity. His INTENT was to deceive your followers.

    You called him on it, and now he does not want to take responsibility for his inappropriate actions.
  • Steve Zagata
    Mr. [removed] already generated over 30 negative replies. In the end it's a bad business decision. We need to interact with each other as if we were eye to eye. That is sometimes difficult on the internet being a faceless community.
  • Josh
    Dear Mari,
    I apologize for hijacking your tweet. Not because I got caught, but obviously because what I did has deeply offended you; and apparently lots of people that read your blog. I have to assume that these people are genuine and not just trying to get an endorsement from you. I do think that it is kind of funny how seriously everyone is making this out to be. It was a transparent attempt (by me) to get people to click on a link. I admit it. I just figured people would realize it was half-way done in jest and move on. I didn't realize that with one click of my Twhirl client that this would turn into a two day saga of the worst Tweet Fail in history. I want to clarify that I am not the owner of the [removed] company. I am the web guy, and I should have known better. The owner of the company is a really good guy, and the [removed] are superb. Again, I am very sorry to have offended you, and I appreciate the lesson on what a bad tweet can turn into. It was a moment of bad judgment on my part, and I hope you all will give us another chance.
  • I have a similar problem with a competitor who follows my online articles and posts. They comment on MY posts and promote their business. It's tacky and shows lack of creativity and imagination. Most intelligent people who read it see right through their unethical business practices. My company doesn't worry about it because we know the cream always rises to the top.
  • Rod Mills
    Of course there are lot's of people with questionable ethics. This is why we are in the financial crisis we are in. His comment that "it's a free country" and "he didn't break any Twitter rules" is correct, but sad he and others go that direction. The bigger question is where is the ethics in business these days? What he did wasn't illegal, but it wasn't right or ethical either.

    I disagree with a comment not to sweat it. We've sat back too long and allowed unethical practices for far too long.

    CEO's take note. We the people are tired of your tricks!
  • One should treat Twitter, and any other social network, as real life conversation. I will certainly not have warm feelings towards someone who is misquoting me in real life, twisting my words to suit his/her means. Retweet Hijacking is just like that.
  • Hi Mari,

    I was shocked by this example of retweeting and also the response that you received. It is irksome but the Universe has ways of dealing with people who operate in such an unethical manner.

    I wish people would realise that honesty, integrity and respect are values to uphold irrespective of the medium you're operating in.

    <abbr>Nickolove Lovemores last blog post..Success Secret - Improve Your Decision-Making Skills</abbr>
  • I took a look at the conversation using a Twitter search and I am just blown away this guy feels he did nothing wrong. I wonder what his customers would say if they were shown?

    He's the type that thinks it's ok to use images off Google, after all, if Google has them on their site then why can't he?

    He's certainly not going to benefit from any Twitter users. HA!

    <abbr>Scott Procks last blog post..Retweet Hijacking - @MariSmith vs @[removed]</abbr>
  • You handled it beautifully, Mari! Out the goof, block him and continue on enjoying your day. The best revenge is living (& tweeting) well!

    <abbr>Doug Champignys last blog post..Twitter Marketing - Retweet Etiquette on Twitter</abbr>
  • The Expert
    Given this guy's ethical code, I'm sure it'd be OK if I slapped a sign promoting my Uncle's taxi company on all of his [removed]...
  • What a shame! I've had my tweets stolen more than a couple of times. I joined a tweeting contest via #plum (contest was to tweet the darnest things kid say). Someone did a 'copy and paste'of my tweet and claimed it as their own to enter the contest! So thick!!

    We can't really do anything to stop Retweet hijacking except maybe post a follow-up tweet saying. That RT from this and this is a Retweet hijack..!

    <abbr>Grace @ Sandier Pasturess last blog post..Turbulence Training deserves a feature on this blog</abbr>
  • IANAL, but i think there should be smething in the libel/slander/identity stealing/misrepresentation/false witness gamut of offenses that fits this.

    Whatever, I know that I will not use any of his [removed] service for the foreseeable future, which is probably not what that guy intended...
  • Wow! That is BRUTAL.

    Creeps weasel their way in everywhere, don't they? Ugh.
  • Heather Kilcrease
    What a shame, unfortunatley people will be dishonest and this will happen. RT hijacking also occurs when someone steals your links you found and posts them with out recognition.

    Now I see that you wan to be positive and upbeat but you have to stand up publicly for what you feel is right.

    I say when Tweeple see this happening we need to then repost pubicly the tweet and insert the correct link. If enough people do this the shady people will think twice before commiting these acts.
  • As with many others, I am very shocked the guy had the nerve to act like he did after being confronted. Not only has he lost his morals, but he doesn't have much common sense either.

    He obviously doesn't understand the reach of the Internet and Twitter. He's made a severely bone headed move and I'm sure he'll be wishing he could take it all back.

    This is what I call a "Tweet Fail" and I have a specific spot on my blog where these go ... this one will be posted in short time and I would encourage any Twitter user to block @CaptainLimos. [Comment by Mari: this Twitter ID has since been taken down!]

    If enough of us help spread the word about this guy, it won't be long before his reputation is unveiled for all.

    Thank you for posting about this I think you handled it great ... Scott

    <abbr>Scott Procks last blog post..Tweep Of The Day - @chadengle</abbr>
  • I believe in this 3-step conflict resolution process:
    1) Approach the individual that wronged you - in the case of Twitter via DM.
    2) If the situation does not get better, involve peers - in the case of Twitter your followers.
    3) If the situation still does not progress, cut off communication with them - in the case of Twitter, a block.

    You handled the situation well, Mari!

    Yes, this is a free nation, but we are also free to also "tune out" the channels we wish not listen to.

    Happy Cinco de Mayo! Toasting you with a margarita!

    Adrian
  • Mari, congratulations on having a brand reputation so strong that someone tries to hijack it for themselves. Not saying what Mr Limo did wasn't yucky. (I think i would have taken more than a wee moment to calm me down!!) But what it says about you is impressive. I seriously doubt that he'd bother to hijack my tweets. You, on the other hand, are one of the Twitter stars (and I'm not talking the @aplusk or @oprah variety.) So when you talk, your fans listen. Welcome being a celeb (or should I say twileb?). Wow. And I can say I knew you when. LOL.
  • Even if it's not against the Twitter TOS, it's false advertising.

    Not to mention unbelievably lame!

    How sad & pathetic & bad-karma-generating to have to stoop to those tactics to get site traffic!

    I guess look on the bright side . . . at least it was "only" a limo service. Imagine if he'd had you endorsing some adult services!! :-/
  • Randall Brennan
    I believe you were right to "out" this guy. Terms of Service violation or not, it is a clear violation of the Golden Rule. How would the Captain have felt if an endorsement of his limo service had been switched to someone else? Karma, dude.
  • I was shocked when I saw your tweet, and even more shocked when reading what he had to say. It really does take all kinds, and obviously he doesn't understand what freedom really means. The freedom to write what we want comes with responsibilities, and what he did IMO should have consequences.

    <abbr>Kathy McGraws last blog post..National Association of REALTORS explains $8,000 First time home buyers tax credit</abbr>
  • Linda
    "RT" infers you are quoting the following tweeps name - In media, misquoting can lead to prosecution - I'm not sure that Social Media should be any different!
  • I believe it does break the TOS. I have read where you have to give credit. @CaptainLimos is totally a douchebag!

    What does being a free country have to do with anything? People like that have no integrity, class or respect for others. They can't stand on their own. They have to cheap and lie to get noticed.

    This has happened to me a few times, which really pissed me off. I privately DM them first, that usually ends it. If not, I call them out publicly. Or I have also tweeted a warner not to retweet hijack, give credit or the retweet police will come knocking on your door. The hijacker usually comes forward and apologies publicly or privately.
  • I think attributing your recommendation to a site you did NOT recommend is FALSE, LYING, and Mr. “Slimemo” is not FREE to do so. I agree with the above comment, if TOS does not deal with this type of dishonesty, it should.
  • Mari,

    I totally agree with you and each of the others who took time to comment. I have only seen this once before but am sure it won't be the last. As Twitter grows this will become even more prevalent. That is the price we pay for allowing ANYONE to join these sites. And since they are FREE, even the "bad" guys will jump on board.

    I applaud the way you handled the situation and appreciate you sharing it with us. I will be sure to pay more attention! BTW, who do I report RT highjacking to? *SMILE

    Have a terrific day and thanks for all you do,

    Heidi

    <abbr>Heidi Richards Mooneys last blog post..Public Service Announcement – Twitter is addicting!</abbr>
  • I think attributing your recommendation to a site you did recommend is FALSE, LYING, and Mr. "Slimemo" is not FREE to do so. I agree with the above comment, if TOS does not deal with this type of dishonesty, it should.
  • Its pretty sad that Twitter has attracted some shady individuals who will Hijack / Hack and Phish in the Twitter world. This is very deceptive showing other Twitter users that you endorsing this when you really are not. Good post!

    <abbr>JustinSMVs last blog post..Twitter Zodiac Signs</abbr>
  • That's just nuts! Sure there's no law against it, but it's unethical and essentially false advertising.

    <abbr>Stephanies last blog post..Writer - Weekly Work at Home Job Idea</abbr>
  • Wow Mari,

    What a major bummer that this happened to you. This is a good example of a really scummy type of retweet hijacking. The worse part of this example is that you were promoting a website with the weight of your credibility and was forced to stand behind a site you did not endorse. I think in your particular situation this should be addressed in Twitter TOS and the account should be suspended for a 30 day period but not deleted.

    I had the same thing happen to me but much less severe. I tweeted out a tweet and noticed a colleague retweeting my tweet but ripping my URL shortener and adding an ad bar based Ow.ly link. I have tried to stay pure in my tweeting to not include commercial ad bars etc and did take a offense. I made a mistake of publicly chastising this person and damaged a relationship for a couple weeks.

    This post really grabbed me because it has two things that really need to be thought about. Retweet Hijacking and tweeting with emotion and a knee jerk response. It's really hard to take things back on Twitter so it is best to go by your theory of the frontpage of the NY Times or will your grandchildren be able to read with a good feeling in 20 years.

    With all that said, I think you pretty much went about it correctly. The issue needed to be addressed and people should be aware it's not accepted (and will most likely be against TOS) to force an endorsement. For Mr. Limo it seems hard for him to wrap his self indulged mind around the concept, so maybe he can think of it like this: What if he were to do the same but force you to endorse porn, a computer trojan / virus or a Twitter scam product? Would he feel that was unethical and should be against Twitter TOS? My guess is, he would probably agree this wouldn't be right. Just because the unethical "shocker" line was not reached does not absolve him of responsibility of socially acceptable ethics.

    This will most likely be an issue addressed in Twitter TOS in the next 6 months or so if Twitter is to keep growing. Good post!

    <abbr>Joels last blog post..“Retweet is stupid” - Think again fellow social media citizens</abbr>
  • Mari,

    While this has not happened to us, this is dirty pool. And his defensive response after you called him out just makes it more pathetic.

    I agree with James that this practice should be spelled out in the TOS and the offenders should be tossed out of Twitter.

    ~Kris
  • Hi Mari, I can't believe that someone who I assume is using Twitter to try to "brand" his business, would take such an 'if you don't like it, too bad' attitude.

    @CaptainLimos seemed to justify his actions by stating several times that he didn't violate Twitter's TOS by replacing your link with his own. I'm no lawyer, but it seems to me that he came very close to violating #4 of Twitter's Basic Terms- "You must not abuse, harass, threaten, impersonate or intimidate other Twitter users."

    While he may not have impersonated you, his Retweet did give the "impression" that you were endorsing his limo services.

    I wonder how he would feel if someone else of his 'character' were to do the same to him, replacing his link with a link to a website of questionable taste?

    And once news of his actions spreads through the social media circles, I'm quite sure you're not the only one who won't be using his limo services while in Dallas, TX.
  • Wow, I can't believe someone would actually do that! Clearly it's wrong. Seems like this guy skipped the line up for ethics...

    <abbr>Jeannes last blog post..Game Two Tonight!</abbr>
  • There is also no hard and fast rule stating when people should block another Twitter user...just a thought I'm throwing out there for no particular reason...
  • Hi Mari,

    I am personally glad to see that you published this story so that we can all be aware of "worst practices". I think you did a very good job of keeping it in a positive light
    :-)
  • Wow I'm kind of shocked at this! I guess I should pay more attention, I haven't noticed any retweet hijacking. I will be looking for it now. For one I would never think of doing this. Guess I'm just not that devious.

    Yeah it's a "free country". But what he did IMO was stealing/taking credit for something that's not his.

    If it's any consolation to you...I would be willing to bet you that his customer service sucks :)

    <abbr>Renees last blog post..Mexican Flag</abbr>
  • Mark Conrau
    Hi Mari
    I agree it is certainly not in the spirit of sharing and cooperation which is what twitter has grown up to be so far. Maybe it is a sign of things to come - I hope not. It is great to retweet something and maybe add a hi, or some such comment - this gives twittering some life and soul, and a reason to come back and interact. I definitely do not condone the hijacking process as just described, and think we should do all we can to stamp out the habit.
    Mark Conrau
  • Wow Mari: that is amazing! Thanks for sharing your story and passing along this information about twitter Hyjacking. SOunds like the Limo Guy will try anything to get ahead. I know there's a name for that...help me. I don't want to be the one to say it outloud. Keep up the good work of informing us. You are the best!
  • Maybe it's a free country but what about morals? I think it is wrong to change the retweet to make it look like someone is endorsing a product when in fact the original tweeter doesn't know anything about the website.

    If a lot of people trust your referrals and we go to a bad site it hurts the original person's reputation.

    I think it also shows that the retweeter is deceptive and I wouldn't want to do business with that person.
  • I wouldn't sweat it Mari. Just leave this to the search engines finding his twitter account and social media making his activities transparent. I wouldn't take a Dallas limo from someone trying to spam like that. Gobble this up now Google :)
  • Wow, Mari, thanks for bringing this to our attention. Obviously @CaptainLimos is in the wrong here, trying to leverage your twithority for his own evil purposes.
    So then the question is, what to do? Tweetbomb @CaptainLimos? Report him to Twitter? How could they or we even monitor this behavior?
  • Mari, that's unfortunate, but expected. The Web is full of many who simply want to make a buck at anyone else's expense. You know the best thing to do is stay positive and move on... after you out him :)
  • Wow. What a shame. The claim that its a free country and therefore okay to act in a despicable manner is hogwash.

    Just because you can doesn't mean you should. He should understand now that anyone who reads this or becomes aware of what he did will now shun him.

    This practice, in my humble opinion, should be spelled out in Twitter's Terms of Service and retweet hijackers should be suspended and lose their accounts.

    James Hofheins
    @jwhof
  • Mari-

    I don't know if he broke Twitter's TOS, but he broke the rules of fair, honest and ethical treatment that we should all observe towards each other.

    Boiling in oil and tar and feathering is too good for him and his two bit company!

    <abbr>Jerry Kidds last blog post..4 different ways to find that lost email</abbr>
blog comments powered by Disqus

Get the Flash Player to see this banner.

See you at BlogWorld Expo!!!

First Name:
Email Address:
 
Mari's Twitters 'n' More Add Me On Facebook
Follow me on Twitter

Recent Readers


Connect With Me:
View Shama Hyder's profile on LinkedIn
 
Mari Smith, Social Media Consultant, Speaker & Trainer | Privacy Policy